top of page

The Unwrap: Understanding the Uncancellation of Kevin Spacey

In the climactic scene of the 1995 neo-noir crime thriller Se7en, Kevin Spacey's character John Doe, a serial killer motivated by the seven deadly sins, reveals the depths of his depravity to the two detectives who have been hunting him. Sitting handcuffed in a police car, Doe calmly explains how he brutally murdered Detective Mills' wife, packaged her head in a box, and had it delivered to this desolate spot.

As Detective Somerset implores his partner not to give Doe the sick satisfaction he craves, Spacey delivers the line that sends Mills over the edge: "What's in the box?" The taunt works. Consumed by wrath, Mills empties his gun into Doe's head, destroying himself and handing the psychopath a twisted moral victory.

It's a chilling scene made unforgettable by the coiled malice and manipulative power of Spacey's performance. For an actor renowned for his uncanny ability to embody cunning, dangerous men who bend others to their will, it might be the ultimate role. But as the world would learn in October 2017, when Spacey was very publicly accused of sexual misconduct, the venerated thespian may have been drawing more from real life than anyone knew.

"I've learned that I hit on a lot of guys," Spacey said recently to Lex Fridman, breaking a long exile to address the events that saw him go, in a matter of days, from one of the most respected figures in Hollywood to a pariah facing career-ending allegations and multiple lawsuits. "I did a lot of things that at the time I thought were sort of playful and fun. I have had to recognize that I crossed boundaries and I made mistakes."

Spacey's staggering fall and the questions it raises lie at the heart of our modern reexamination of sex, power and exploitation. To what degree does achieving great success and influence, especially in an industry long plagued by predation, both enable and perhaps encourage the misuse of that status? How should we weigh the work of brilliant artists against their personal transgressions? And in an age of instantaneous social judgment, who decides whether the path to redemption is ever truly open?

A prodigiously gifted performer celebrated for his shape-shifting versatility, Spacey, 63, first gained wide attention in the 1990s with an Oscar-winning supporting turn in The Usual Suspects and a titular role in the indie gem Swimming with Sharks. But it was his performance as the jaded suburban dad Lester Burnham in 1999's American Beauty, which scored him a second Academy Award, that cemented his status as one of the preeminent actors of his generation.

A five-year run playing the Machiavellian politician Frank Underwood in Netflix's House of Cards, starting in 2013, vaulted Spacey even higher. His creation of the fourth wall-breaking schemer, who connives his way from Congress to the Oval Office, made the streaming service a major player and ushered in the era of binge-watching. At his pinnacle, Spacey could get any project he wanted made and was raking in $20 million a year.

Then, in a plot twist as shocking as any in his lauded oeuvre, Spacey's world caved in. On October 29, 2017, actor Anthony Rapp alleged that, in 1986, when he was 14 years old, an intoxicated 26-year-old Spacey had laid on top of him in a bed and made a sexual advance after a party at Spacey's apartment.

As the #MeToo reckoning sparked by the revelations about producer Harvey Weinstein weeks earlier gathered steam, more accusers emerged claiming the Oscar winner had groped or assaulted them, often early in their careers.

Within 72 hours, Netflix had suspended production on House of Cards' final season and severed ties with its star. Completed films were reshot to remove Spacey, while the historical drama Gore, in which he portrayed author Gore Vidal, was shelved entirely. As the list of allegations grew to include more men, stretching back decades and including multiple accounts of misconduct at Spacey's tenure as artistic director of London's Old Vic theater from 2004 to 2015, the two-time Oscar winner disappeared.

"It was as if someone had stolen my essence," Spacey recounted. "There were days I thought I would never work again." Spacey's banishment from the entertainment industry was swift and total. Spacey later reflected, "There were days I thought I would never work again. It was as if someone had stolen my essence."

The disgraced actor's disappearance was so complete that when he suddenly resurfaced in a 2018 YouTube video titled "Let Me Be Frank," delivering a cryptic monologue as his House of Cards alter ego, it proved impossible to decode if it was a defiant rebuttal, a desperate plea for attention or a disturbing case of life imitating art. Like so many of the enigmatic antiheroes Spacey excelled at embodying, the man behind the characters remained inscrutable.

Now, seven years after his career imploded, Spacey is having a comeback. Hebooked his first film role since 2017, as a small part in a British indie production, and has undertaken a publicity campaign to rehabilitate his image. Central to his bid for a professional resurrection is the contention that he has been mistreated and maligned.

Spacey has asserted that while he accepts responsibility for inappropriate behavior over the years, the punishment did not fit the crime. "The craziest part is so much of what was alleged never happened," he maintained, emphasizing that he has never been convicted in court. "What's hardest is people deciding they know something when they weren't there and couldn't have known."

However, Spacey's efforts to minimize the severity of the allegations against him ring hollow to many. Even if the worst accusations remain unproven, the actor's own admissions paint a disturbing picture of a powerful star leveraging his influence to harass and abuse vulnerable underlings.

The Spacey scandal provokes unsettling questions about the corrosive effects of power. Does reaching the summit of fame and privilege, your influence unassailable, inexorably warp your moral compass? Is it possible to acquire that degree of clout, especially in the ego-driven entertainment world, and not have it erode your humanity?

An examination of Spacey's turbulent childhood provides insight into the wellspring of his later troubles. Born into what he has described as a "very unusual family," Spacey grew up in the shadow of a viciously abusive father. Thomas Fowler, a frustrated writer who supported the family by churning out technical manuals, was a Holocaust denier and avowed neo-Nazi who force-fed his children a steady diet of dark conspiracy theories and hate.

"I cannot tell you the number of hours I was trapped listening to his f**ked up lectures about prejudice and white supremacy," Spacey revealed to Fridman, crediting his protective older sister for rejecting their father's toxic indoctrination. "I knew everything he was saying was wrong, was against people, when I loved people."

For a sensitive child already grappling with dyslexia, theater offered Spacey a transformative escape hatch, a portal into other identities where he could shed his own trauma and insecurities and win praise. He began honing his craft early, performing stand-up at 16 and captivating a high school drama teacher who introduced him to Oscar winner Jack Lemmon. Struck by the teenager's raw talent, Lemmon took him under his wing, urging him to devote his life to acting.

"He became my father figure," Spacey reflected. Over time, he would form close ties with other towering male legends like Marlon Brando and Al Pacino, seeking to forge the paternal bond he never had as a boy.

But while those relationships proved pivotal to Spacey's development, the wounds of his traumatic upbringing may have inflicted invisible psychic scars. By his own account, the scarcity of unconditional love and sense of abandonment that defined his youth bred a deep-seated "confusion" and "mistrust" that warped his connections with others as an adult.

Those deficits were on display in his work with director David Fincher, who helmed Spacey in films like Se7en. "Sometimes on takes, he would tell me, 'I don't believe a word coming out of your mouth,'" Spacey recalled. "He was trying to strip away the artifice, the performance, to get me to just be present and real."

Perhaps that's why inhabiting the skin of monsters, sociopaths who exploit others to mask their own hollowness, came so instinctively to Spacey. On some level, he may have been channeling his own boyhood experience of learning to conceal his authentic self for self-preservation. When your formative understanding of attachment is an emotionally abusive father whose love hinged on hate, a mercurial mother complicit in the torment, you absorb a certain ruthless survivalist logic.

Achieving stratospheric fame and adulation doesn't heal those primal scars so much as give them a bigger stage. The impulse to dominate, to take what you covet without concern for others, gets turbocharged. Rising to the top of the Hollywood food chain, your power unquestioned, would only amplify the resentment of anyone who challenges your supremacy.

In Spacey's telling, his darkest days came in the aftermath of Rapp's grave accusation going public, when the industry establishment that once idolized him turned against him en masse overnight. The onslaught of social media condemnation that greeted the news, an intense outpouring of "burn it all down" fury from a public that had long suppressed its rage against predatory powerful men, cracked his psyche.

"In that moment, I felt there was no way out, no way forward," Spacey said. "The idea of taking my own life was very real. It scared me."

His suicidal ideation reflected not just his own personal anguish but the febrile cultural temperature. In the post-Weinstein tsunami of pent-up outrage against sexual abuse by seemingly untouchable authority figures, any nuance or due process was discarded in favor of a zero-tolerance policy for alleged misconduct. A long-overdue societal reckoning, a new paradigm to dismantle rape culture and hold abusers accountable, took an understandably scorched-earth approach.

In that overheated context, Spacey's choice of public response only fanned the flames. Rather than unequivocally addressing Rapp's allegation, he issued a cagey statement claiming no recollection of the encounter while apologizing for what "would have been deeply inappropriate drunken behavior."

Compounding the obtuse non-denial, Spacey took the occasion to come out as gay, confirming long-swirling rumors in a maneuver many saw as a cynical ploy for absolution. The backlash was seismic, the post promptly dubbed a case study in PR crisis mismanagement.

Even as subsequent vetting of claims against Spacey revealed inconsistencies and doubts about key details—Rapp appears to have exaggerated the extent of their later contact; other accusers revised their stories; critical witnesses were lacking—the die had been cast. In the eyes of culture, he was branded a predator cloaked in artistic brilliance. No quantum of legal exoneration could expunge that stigma.

Seven years on, Spacey now expresses contrition for conduct he characterizes as "arrogant" and "boundary-crossing," describing a period of introspection to examine how living closeted fed destructive patterns. Yet true redemption, many argue, cannot be a PR-engineered rehabilitation tour but an authentic journey of atonement and change. Earning the public's absolution after egregious betrayals demands not just time and distance but meaningful amends.

"Forgiveness is a powerful, beautiful thing," Spacey maintained in his Fridman interview. "People go to church every week asking for it." But in theological terms, grace isn't an entitlement owed the penitent. It arrives on the humble, often arduous path of making right what we've broken in others and ourselves.

A culture grappling with the ashes of fallen idols, disillusioned fans, and wounded victims has hard questions to face about whether zero tolerance must mean zero possibility of redemption. We need not be prisoners of the past, but nor can we heal it on command. The scars linger, the loss is real. Spacey said he wants to be part of that painful, necessary reckoning. The onus is on him to show, not just tell, he's changed.


Commenting has been turned off.
bottom of page